EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation

New EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation: extensive powers of intervention for the European Commission

International trade and investment are pillars of the global economy and enable companies to distribute their products and services worldwide.

So far, the only means for addressing distortions of competition in the EU caused by foreign subsidies are anti-subsidy duties. In many cases, however, this instrument does not go far enough. For this reason, the EU has decided to develop and enact a new instrument, which is unique in the world so far, the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation (EU-FSR).

What is the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation?

The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation is an EU regulation that aims to ensure fair conditions of competition in the EU. It entered into force on 12 January 2023 and took effect on 12 July 2023, certain notification obligations apply from 12 October 2023. The regulation allows the European Commission (“Commission”) to comprehensively review foreign (non-EU) subsidies that may have an impact on competition in the EU and enables the Commission to impose very broad remedies.

In addition, it contains extensive notification requirements for companies wishing to carry out transactions or participate in public tenders in the EU from 12 October 2023. In order to complete a required notification, companies worldwide will have to provide detailed data on the financial contributions received from non-EU Member States, globally. As of today, most companies do not have such data readily available. It cannot be pulled in a quick and comprehensive manner through existing systems. This means, identifying and aggregating the data can require considerable time and resources. It will be difficult to assemble the required data within the time constraints of a typical deal or bid process. Companies are well advised to address this issue early to ensure deal readiness.

Scope and Application

The EU foreign subsidies regulation applies to all economic activities within the European Union and imposes notification obligations for certain mergers and public procurement procedures.

Powers of the European Commission

The Regulation grants the European Commission extensive powers of investigation to obtain the necessary information and identify distortions of competition caused by subsidies from third countries. The Commission can issue requests for information to companies, conduct market investigations and carry out inspections in the EU, as well as outside of the EU if it receives permission from the respective third country. It can also use market information provided by companies, Member States, and other interested parties.

The four instruments of the Commission

The Regulation provides for four key instruments that can be used by the Commission:

Sanctions and remedies

Notified transactions may not be implemented until approved by the Commission (stand-still obligation). In public procurement processes, which exceed the notification thresholds, a contract cannot be awarded until the Commission has cleared relevant bidders. A violation of these rules can lead to significant fines, up to 10% of the total annual turnover of the company concerned. In addition, the Commission can prohibit the implementation of a transaction or annul the award of a public contract to a bidder if it finds that the relevant party benefited from subsidies that affected the transaction or its bid.

Standard of Review

When assessing whether a foreign subsidy distorts competition in the common market, the Commission balances the negative effects of the relevant subsidies against the positive effects in terms of the development of the subsidized economic activity and can take remedial action if a distortion of the internal market is found. As noted above, in merger reviews, the Commission focuses solely on effects of foreign subsidies in the context of a particular transaction. In public procurement processes, the focus is on whether foreign subsides enable the bidder to offer uncompetitively cheap prices.

Possible remedies are:

  • In merger and public procurement reviews companies can offer commitments but are not required to do so. However, the Commission may prohibit transactions or disqualify a bidder. In ex-officio proceedings, the Commission may impose remedies without the consent of the undertakings (Art. 11 (2)). These must be proportionate.
  • Explicitly mentioned examples: 
    • Granting access to infrastructure
    • Reducing capacity or market presence, if necessary by temporarily restricting business activities
    • Forgoing certain investments
    • Licensing on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions
    • Publication of the results of research and development
    • Disposal of certain assets
    • Order to reverse the merger
    • Repayment of the foreign subsidy, including an appropriate interest
    • Order to adjust governance structure.
  • In addition: Possibility to set further obligation to provide information on mergers or award procedures (Art. 8).

Need for action for companies

What do companies need to do now? First of all, companies which plan transactions or the participation in public procurement processes in the EU or the EU Member States should start gathering the foreign financial contributions data. In the case of planned transactions, companies must check whether a notification obligation exists and, if so, allow sufficient time to comply with it. The same applies if a company intends to participate in relevant public procurement procedures. Moreover, companies may want to monitor the investigation activity of the Commission for relevance to their business activities.

To avoid possible sanctions, companies should inform themselves in good time about their obligations in connection with mergers and public procurement procedures.

How PwC Legal can support companies

PwC coordinates the planning and collection of all relevant information across the group and helps set up the necessary business processes.

We offer an experienced, multidisciplinary team with expertise in all relevant areas. This includes specialists in the EU FSR process, forensics/accounting, tax law and state aid law. In addition, we bring in business process specialists to ensure that necessary new business processes can be meaningfully anchored in your company. Of course, all our experts work with the latest technologies to create lean and reliable processes.

Contact us

Daniel C. Arita, LL.M. (VUW)

Mariya Atanasova LL.M., Compliance Officer (Univ.)

Dr. Paul Bäder, LL.M. (University of Cape Town)

Miriam Sophie Baumann

Katharina Beitler

Senior Manager Munich

Martin Bermes, LL.M. (Univ. of Glasgow)

Anna-Lena Berning

Dr. Thomas Beyer

Senior Manager Berlin

Stephanie Borner

Dr. Jens Bornscheid

Katharina Brandenburger, LL.B.

Ulrike Brückner

Giorgina Cavallo

Marie-Christine Cichorowski

Philipp Denisov

Jutta Dillschneider

Anna Dold, LL.M. (King’s College London)

Hanna Friederike Ehlers

Johanna Ehmann

Dr. Ruven Erchinger

Dr. Minkus Fischer

Dr. Nicole Franke

Jascha Fröhler

Dr. Marco Garbers, LL.M. (Cornell)

Stefan Gentzsch, LL.M. (Stellenbosch University)

Marie-Valentine Goffin

Dr. Anne Grunwald, LL.M. (University of Virginia)

Dr. Jan Dietrich Harmjanz

Hannah Henning

Franziska Hoffmann, LL.M., Nimwegen

Prof. Dr. Uwe Hohage

Christian Hohlwein

Christina Hüschemenger, LL.M. (Wellington)

Dr. Turkhan Ismayilzada, LL.M. (USF)

Franziska Jungesblut

Steffen Kamprolf

Christine Kaniak-Hockel, LL.M. (Waikato)

Rebecca Klenke, LL.M. (Münster)

Lena Klingebiel

Paul Knipper, LL.M. (Lisbon)

Dr. Tobias Koppmann

Franziska Kostrewa

Janaina Kutzner Pinto

Carolin Felizitas Lang, LL.M. (SUN)

Sebastian Lattmann, LL.M., MBA

Dr. Ilya Levin

Matthias Lillig, LL.M (Exeter)

Stefanie Lisson, E.M.L.E (Aix-en-Provence)

Lars Lübbers, LL.M. (Birmingham)

Kristin Lyaskova, LL.M. Finance

Heiner Mecklenburg, M.Sc (London)

Dr. Saskia Naomi Merle

Dr. Melanie Meyer

Tobias Mittrach, LL.M. Taxation

Stephanie Müller

Gloria Müller, LL.M. (Münster)

Daniela Nagler

Friederike Räbiger

Michelle Reddig

Dr. Timo Rinne

Julius Rodatz

Stefanie Rzeniecki, LL.M, Kent (Great Britain)

Barbara Schimmelpfennig

Lukas Schmidt

Senior Associate Mannheim

Hendrik Schödder, LL.M.

Senior Manager Düsseldorf

Catharina Schröder

Frauke Schubmann

Rebecca Schüssler, LL.M. (University of Aberdeen)

Dr. Melanie Schwaderer, LL.M. (LSE)

Dr. Jörg Schwerdtfeger

Dr. Andrea Schwimmbeck

Gwendolin Seinecke-Krankowsky

Stephan Söbbeke

Lars Spiller

Stephan Steiner

Theresa Stollmann-Schmitz

Christian Teßmann

Berthold Theuffel-Werhahn

Katharina Ulrich

Senior Associate Munich

Dr. Danielle von Hegel

Dr. Gerung von Hoff, LL.M. (Chicago)

Prof. Dr. Matthias von Kaler

Katharina von Smirnow, LL.M. (Penn State)

Marina Weidl

Kerstin Weihmann

Sabine Weiss, LL.M. (Duke University School of Law)

Dr. Thomas Wenninger, LL.M. (GWU)

Julia Westermann

Dr. Anna-Kristine Wipper

Dr. Malgorzata Wojtas LL.M. (Viadrina)

Igor Zarva, LL.M. (Versicherungsrecht Universität Hamburg)

Dr. Michael Zenker

Senior Manager Cologne